Book : A philosophy
for scientists Shield Crest Publishing see
the address of this web page is
A statement of Pierre Fermat (1601-1665) challenged mathematicians untill today.
A genius agaisnt our supermen, who wins ?
He was not even paid to do research.
Adib Ben Jebara
From Adib Ben Jebara
Please take note of the web address.
About after life and about Fermat
A soul is partly made of thoughts.
Thoughts are mathematical waves.
Brain waves are something else.
Anything mathematical is eternal (“non-perishable”).
Thus souls are immortal.
Afterlife is for souls, not for bodies.
For the first time in the History of mankind afterlife is proven to exist in some way.
With afterlife being no more a matter of faith, there is a new intellectual horizon.
Fermat (1601-1665) did have a proof for Fermat Last Theorem,
which was not found because of an intellectual planet Middle Age
since half a century ago.
Fermat Proof is given in the first chapter.
Adib Ben Jebara.
Book : A philosophy for scientists Shield Crest Publishing see
“A philosophy for scientists” Shield Crest Publishing
Beyond the book :
-Alexandre Koyre wrote that Galileo sent the Earth in the Skies, meaning the mathematical
theories of the Skies.
From what I understood, that was allowed by the coming of Jesus Christ, man-god.
I have a doubt about that point of view because of the existence of Archimedes about 200 years
-Adjacent disciplines intermingling will boost research.
-Without considering intuition, discussion and research are sterilized.
About mathematics and religion
This text is about Judaism, Christianity and Islam.
A variable particular case of a religion is valid.
At its birth, a religion is valid.
In the far future, no religion is valid.
In between, a religion could be valid or not.
However, a part of the religions is valid.
It is the part which makes people make good deeds.
There is an analogy between the validity of the axiom of choice and that of a religion.
Besides, in both cases, the evolution is very slow while people accept or reject the whole thing.
Adib Ben Jebara
95% of people are overspecialized,
it will lead to nothing good.
About short cuts
In front of (when
we face) complexity, there are short cuts.
The existence of
short cuts is a consequence of the existence of God.
To know histories helps to find shortcuts.
To know where a doubt persists helps to find shortcuts.
We often have to be interested in 1963.Until 1963 there was no option for extreme specialization.
This theory of short cuts fits in the theory of total quality management.
About time and indeterminism in the physics of particles
Let Ui be a countable family of non empty sets of urelements (non sets), the negation of
the axiom of choice implies that the Cartesian Product of the family is empty.
We know from “A philosophical approach to Fermat Last Theorem” in "A philosophy
for scientists" Adib Ben Jebara Shield Crest Publishing that only a particular
case of the axiom of choice is true.
And from "About space and time in quantum mechanics" Adib Ben Jebara
Bulletin of Symbolic Logic September 2008, p. 410., we know that the negation of the axiom of choice can be applied to particles.
That is a basis for the teleportation of the particle since the particle will have much
“time” to move without the time at our level being much .
EXCERPT from “About a time not totally ordered
(published in the colloquium brochure WSEAS MCSS’15 Dubai 22 February) :
“For elementary particles, time is a set of urelements of the negation of the
axiom of choice.
So, time is not totally ordered and there is a lateral time.
In an experiment, if a particle enters a hole twice that must be that it
enters and enters again from the same side in a lateral time.
The second time is perceived at our level as being after the first time
while it is not at the level of the particle.
In another experiment, the particle enters two holes at the same time, the
lateral time appears to be the same time.”
Mechanics theory has a tendency to progress by introducing more mathematics which may
receive industrial applications after some dozens of years.
We are no more in statistical mechanics, because the 2 coordinates of time
are known, the probability of finding the particle in one place is either zero or 1.
Addendum : one has to pay attention to the weak structure of time at the level of elementary particles.
it does not matter so much if fundamental indeterminism exist
because it will be reduced whenever physics progress.
Heisenberg uncertainty principle can be bypassed.
The principle states that the more precisely the position of some particle is determined, the less precisely its speed can be known, and vice versa
That is if we do not know the orthogonal time for the particle but only the time at our level.
If we know the orthogonal time, the speed is changed by it and the uncertainty principle
with the time at our level does not apply.
Let us notice that Newton first law is partly contradicted :
F=0 V constant but the particle does not move indefinitely as there is no infinite path.
From: TaCitS 2017
Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2017 1:51 AM
To: Adib Ben Jebara
Subject: TaCitS 2017 notification for paper 3
Dear Adib Ben Jebara,
We regret to inform you that your abstract, About time and indeterminism in
physics of particles was not selected for presentation at TaCitS. There was
significant competition for presentation slots, and many strong abstracts
had to be declined to maintain a balance of topics.
However, we hope you will still consider joining us for the conference in